jonnyGURU Forums
Home Site Search Reviews Articles Contest Links PSU FAQs  


Go Back   jonnyGURU Forums > Water Cooler > Off Topic

Off Topic Anything goes... within reason

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-25-2017
Stefan Payne Stefan Payne is offline
Flux Capacitor User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,845
Thanks: 2
Thanked 249 Times in 208 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuckles_56 View Post
My best guess it is as a result of this article
No, that's too new.
That myth is around way longer than that article...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-25-2017
Nuckles_56's Avatar
Nuckles_56 Nuckles_56 is offline
Zero point energy user
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 164
Thanks: 322
Thanked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Default

That was my best guess and is the only time that I have seen anything like it
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-26-2017
McSteel's Avatar
McSteel McSteel is offline
Naughty
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 104
Thanked 396 Times in 273 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan Payne View Post
where does that shit come from?
I couldn't find any evidence of it.

The only thing I could find was the Lifetime spec in capacitor datasheets...
"Capacitor aging" is the term that got thrown around the 'net, and was at some point incorporated into the very first PSU calculators. Someone incorrectly stipulated that old and worn out caps will result in the actual direct lowering of max supplied power, and the brilliant idea caught on.

I mean I can accept that ESR will drift over time due to electrolyte degradation and evaporation, and I can also accept that this would result in less ripple suppression and perhaps even a bit looser v-reg. But if the PSU and its components are at all worth their salt, the effect shouldn't be overly pronounced, perhaps even negligible in some cases.

However, instead of concluding that it's not max delivered power that goes down but rather the quality of it, some genius took things a bit to literally.

Then someone else somewhere exclaimed that if caps degrade over time, all the other components must do too, which led to the simple and very wrong "PSUs deteriorate over time, thus their power output lowers" myth.

It's right up there with the "multi-rail traps power through unnecessary limitations" and "80+ rating is a direct indicator of quality and performance" mental delights...
__________________
Careful what you wish for... You just might get it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to McSteel For This Useful Post:
turkey3_scratch (11-05-2017)
  #24  
Old 10-26-2017
Stefan Payne Stefan Payne is offline
Flux Capacitor User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,845
Thanks: 2
Thanked 249 Times in 208 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McSteel View Post
"Capacitor aging" is the term that got thrown around the 'net, and was at some point incorporated into the very first PSU calculators. Someone incorrectly stipulated that old and worn out caps will result in the actual direct lowering of max supplied power, and the brilliant idea caught on.
Now that you mention it, I think I remember something I don't want to...

Quote:
Originally Posted by McSteel View Post
It's right up there with the "multi-rail traps power through unnecessary limitations" and "80+ rating is a direct indicator of quality and performance" mental delights...
...and that peak efficiency of a PSU is at 50% load...
...and that PSU must not be used to 100% (well, in ancient days that indeed was the case)...

And other fairy tales about Power Supplys...
It's just a black box that generates power, has NO effect on FPS, so utterly unimportant...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-05-2017
turkey3_scratch's Avatar
turkey3_scratch turkey3_scratch is offline
was here for PSUs, now for the jokes
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 246
Thanked 197 Times in 139 Posts
Default

If this was 1984 and I was developing Newspeak, I would remove the words "power" and "max" from the new language.

Mcsteel, where you been, in the woods hiding?

Plus, speaking of these "myths", older articles from Hardwaresecrets also kind of have them.

Quote:
Finally, you will need to know how much power your PC will really consume before picking a power supply. There are several calculators on the Internet that can help you out with this; we recommend this one. We also recommend that you choose a power supply that will be working between 40% and 60% of its maximum capacity. There are two reasons for this. The first is efficiency, a subject that we will explain next. Second, you will have headroom for future upgrades. Get the result obtained from the calculator and multiply it by 2. This is the power supply wattage we recommend that you buy. (You will be surprised that most systems will require a power supply with less than 450 W, even with our adjustment.)
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/every...er-supplies/8/
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-05-2017
jonnyGURU's Avatar
jonnyGURU jonnyGURU is offline
Site Founder
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jonnyGURU forums, of course!
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 423
Thanked 1,557 Times in 961 Posts
Default

To be fair, that article is from 2008 and old PSU tech worked on a fixed switching frequency. Efficiency that peaked at 50%, and often well beyond 80 PLUS requirements for that load, would often "barely hit" 80 PLUS targets at 20% and 100%. So it's not really a false statement.

Not until LLC's variable frequencies have we seen the flat line efficiency that we fairly commonly seen today.
__________________
Rest in peace Mike Clements aka Yellowbeard
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jonnyGURU For This Useful Post:
turkey3_scratch (11-05-2017)
  #27  
Old 11-07-2017
Stefan Payne Stefan Payne is offline
Flux Capacitor User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,845
Thanks: 2
Thanked 249 Times in 208 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyGURU View Post
Efficiency that peaked at 50%, and often well
Well, according to the ancient Planet3dnow reviews, no.
Peak Efficiency was mostly at higher points like 80%.

Here the old Link for the 2006/2007 roundups:


http://www.planet3dnow.de/artikel/ha...unter_50_euro/
http://www.planet3dnow.de/artikel/ha.../mittelklasse/
http://www.planet3dnow.de/artikel/ha...2006/highend//

The Problem is that we don't have much data for that timeframe...

Quote:
Originally Posted by turkey3_scratch View Post
Plus, speaking of these "myths", older articles from Hardwaresecrets also kind of have them.
Well, yeah, but in 2008 what now is the lower end was high(est) end then.
And also there were some problems with full load at the time. Tomshardware did some 24h endurance test with PSU and many failed - that was in 2005 or so.
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/stress...view-1362.html
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-09-2017
turkey3_scratch's Avatar
turkey3_scratch turkey3_scratch is offline
was here for PSUs, now for the jokes
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 246
Thanked 197 Times in 139 Posts
Default

Yeah but low end units today may be the same way which is why these myths still exist, because they sort of do apply to low end units.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-09-2017
rafal_iB_PL rafal_iB_PL is offline
Flux Capacitor User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 95
Thanked 165 Times in 147 Posts
Default

And even then they are not terribly relevant anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © JonnyGURU.com 2000 -