Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Is LLC topology reliable?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Korea
    Posts
    298
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    145
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    19
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Default Is LLC topology reliable?

    Some claim that LLC is not reliable as forward because it's more complex, is LLC used in super high-reliability needed applications too?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Missouri; USA
    Posts
    5,094
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    415
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    27
    Thanked in
    20 Posts

    Default

    LLC is used in the medical, server, and other industrial applications. It's reliable enough.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    jonnyGURU forums, of course!
    Posts
    16,199
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    544
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    304
    Thanked in
    220 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rgbodosk View Post
    Some claim that LLC is not reliable as forward because it's more complex, is LLC used in super high-reliability needed applications too?
    As Tator Tot said: LLC is used in everything.

    These "some" people you are talking to are talking at a very high level. Similar to saying "the grass is brown because it is not green" instead of explaining that the grass lacks the nutrients required to produce chlorophyll."

    ANY circuit with more components is less reliable than one with many components. It's a numbers game. Double the components means twice as many things that can allow it to potentially fail.

    But to flat out say it's more unreliable is false. You can have a double forward that lasts ten years and you can have an LLC last twenty years. Based on empirical data, does that now mean that double forward is less reliable???? No. It's bullshit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction, CO
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    115
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    63
    Thanked in
    56 Posts

    Default

    It might even be argue that the switching for LLC is much gentler on the transistors than for older designs.

    Take for example a traditional household switch, it will in general switch randomly on the AC cycle; now add a circuit that has it switching at the zero point, more complicated but the switch itself may last much longer.
    Last edited by ashiekh; 3 Weeks Ago at 01:11 PM.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to ashiekh For This Useful Post:

    hello_there_123 (3 Weeks Ago)

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    98
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    36
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    9 Posts

    Default

    I'd guess that there are certain components whose expected lifetime in a Power supply is MUCH less than all the other components, like the primary side FETs and fan (which are also found in all PSU, regardless of topology). So it's not wholly true that twice the components = twice as likely to fail.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction, CO
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    115
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    63
    Thanked in
    56 Posts

    Default

    I would have said the secondary capacitors and fan, and left out the switching transistors; but that is just me. I tend to rebuild old supplies with top grade secondary capacitors and oil the fan to leave a unit that may endure longer than the new unit did; or at least that is my hope.

    My video card GPU has 1.8 billion transistors, but I anticipate an almost indefinite lifetime as it seems to run rather cool and has no fan.
    Last edited by ashiekh; 3 Weeks Ago at 05:41 PM.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to ashiekh For This Useful Post:

    hello_there_123 (3 Weeks Ago)

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    98
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    36
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    9 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ashiekh View Post
    I would have said the secondary capacitors and fan, and left out the switching transistors; but that is just me.
    Huh, I seem to recall JG saying somewhere that cap failures in modern PSUs are pretty rare and that it's mostly the FETs that die. I must be mistaken though... My bad.

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction, CO
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    115
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    63
    Thanked in
    56 Posts

    Default

    Rest assured that the Guru knows, and that I am just behind the times.

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    268
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    90
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to none77 For This Useful Post:

    ehume (3 Weeks Ago), hello_there_123 (2 Weeks Ago)

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Germany, Berlin
    Posts
    1,629
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    983
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    36
    Thanked in
    28 Posts

    Default

    From RMA stats I cannot see any difference between LLC and Double forward. Be aware RMA stats only cover the warranty period for each PSU though. What happens later is not relevant for RMA any more.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Philipus II For This Useful Post:

    rgbodosk (3 Weeks Ago)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •