Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: X2900XT Review

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    105
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default X2900XT Review

    Last edited by alexk; 05-13-2007 at 11:02 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Yup. It's been all over the overclocking forums.

    I think that some of the problem might be driver related, but other than that I'm a bit disappointed in the card as far as DX9 performance goes. I play STALKER avidly, so if the 8800 series does better with STALKER I'll be buying an 8800GTS 640mb.

    For those interested you can buy the HIS 2900XT from Case-mod.com for 414$. That pretty decent considering HIS usually has an enthusiast cooling solution on their cards, and they apparently are also going to bundle a voucher for a good game in there (I've heard that it's either Crysis or Half Life 2: Episode 2).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    105
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulTa View Post
    so if the 8800 series does better with STALKER
    I'm sure it does. STALKER was heavily optimized for Nvidia cards from the beginning - I remember reading a very old interview with STALKER's team where they specifically mentioned Nvidia and all the optimizations they were doing for their cards (unfortunately I can't find a live link anymore), plus there were numerous posts from ATi users all over the official forums (especially Russian ones) complaining about horrible performance with "full dynamic lighting" enabled.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    jonnyGURU forums, of course!
    Posts
    15,935
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    528
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    210
    Thanked in
    154 Posts

    Default

    It's driver and currently available benchmarks.

    We can't give the card a fair shake until we see it on 3DMark'07 running Vista.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    985
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Well, looks like it takes only 17W more than the 8800GTX....

    That makes it consume what? 165W at the most? I told you so....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    105
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Well, looks like it takes only 17W more than the 8800GTX....

    That makes it consume what? 165W at the most? I told you so....
    First of all, ATi themselves (just read the review more carefully... it not that hard to do ) claim that it consumes more than 200w, second of all, do you have the exact data of the 8800GTX's power consumption? Because from what I've seen there's no official specifications anywhere on Nvidia's official page and a different websites claim totally different power consumption for it, up to 200w at full load:
    http://www.pcworld.in/review/article.../secId=3342337

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    985
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    200W at full load???? Are you kidding me?

    Hilbert over at Guru3D has shown time and again that they take sufficiently LESS than that. Take this for example:

    http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/408/4/

    Two of the Water Cooled editions PLUS THE REST OF THE SYSTEM under load draw 471W. So are you telling me his X6800, Raptor HD, 2GB ram, fans +++ draw ONLY 71W? In addition to that, the reading at the outlet is done AFTER efficiency is factored in. So, even if the PSU being used was working at 80% efficiency the components would only be drawing about 377W. 200W per 8800GTX....I don't think so

    Don't be so naive.

    In addition, the reviewer at VR Zone mentioned what the ATI mouthpiece SAID but if you read further you will see that they actually TESTED it under load conditions with a clamp meter:

    http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4946&s=9

    I see 17W more than a GTX under load.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    So, what's the general Jonnyguru concensus here... the X2900XT a success at the 400$ price point?

    I know it's hard to pass judgment since (as Jonny stated) we don't have proper benchmarks for it, but I'm personally disappointed with the DX9 performance. I'd say that as a direct competitor for the 8800GTS 640mb, it's a failure.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    53
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Here's another review (a very short one though) of the HD 2900XT:
    http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/articl...1&pagenumber=1

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Damn, now that review puts the 2900XT above the GTS... What a sad, confused little hardware enthusiast I am.

    I need to buy a card tomorrow, so here's hoping that something more definitive comes out!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •