Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: +12V/+5V load proportions for testing group regulated units

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,700
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    116
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default +12V/+5V load proportions for testing group regulated units

    How are/should be loads on these rails selected in progressive tests to evaluate stability of group regulated units?

    For example, if we have 500W group regulated unit with 432W of 12V capacity and 120W 3,3/5V combined, how should loads be picked?

    Both 432W 12V + 68W 5V/3,3V and 380W 12V + 120W 5V/3,3V and 406W 12V + 94W 5V/3,3V (halfway between first two) are valid as far as load distribution is concerned, yet will produce very different voltage readings. There may also be a set of progressive loads which will produce zero drop on either of rails, but does this mean group regulated unit has perfect regulation on said rail? I don't think so.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Germany, Berlin
    Posts
    1,617
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    969
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    30
    Thanked in
    24 Posts

    Default

    For standard load testing I use the 80Plus methodology. I've read the official testing guidelines and put the formula into Excel.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    2,245
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    129
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    12
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Default

    Well, each PSU model (I should go so far as to say each sample) has a (slightly) different crossload pattern. Short of doing what some of the reviewers already do - applying a "full spectrum" crossload pattern (crmaris, makalu, Zhuoke, SiYu, and some others) - you can't be sure what the best (most fair?) approach is.

    Do you emulate a "typical system"? Or perhaps decide on some fixed percentages of maximum ratings for each rail? Or maybe a fixed ratio between 5V and 12V load..? Whichever you choose, you can't be called out on it, if you keep your method and decision consistent.

    Personally, I'd use a fixed ratio of 6:1 in favor of 12V. Then I'd not be lazy and do two more tests, one with a fixed 5V load and progressive 12V, then one with a fixed 12V and progressive 5V. This would probably be overkill in some ways, but it would also paint a clearer picture of the PSU's "character".
    Careful what you wish for... You just might get it.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to McSteel For This Useful Post:

    rafal_iB_PL (09-27-2013)

Similar Threads

  1. 12V load for burn-in testing
    By ashiekh in forum PC Power Supply Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-14-2018, 03:52 PM
  2. Score against Group Regulated units?
    By awesomegamer919 in forum PC Power Supply Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 10-15-2017, 01:05 AM
  3. indy regulated & group regulated
    By van der decken in forum PC Power Supply Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2010, 03:44 AM
  4. Load Testing
    By davidhammock200 in forum Testing Methodology Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-08-2009, 04:30 AM
  5. Flashy Tagan supply-group regulated? OEM?
    By signmeuptoo in forum PC Power Supply Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-10-2008, 08:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •